These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515736)

  • 1. Further considerations of null hypothesis testing.
    Clark CM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1999 Apr; 21(2):283-4. PubMed ID: 10515736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical practices: the seven deadly sins.
    Millis S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 13680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology.
    Fidler F; Burgman MA; Cumming G; Buttrose R; Thomason N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1539-44. PubMed ID: 17002771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meeting rigorous statistical standards in case reports.
    Victor JD; Schiff ND
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):592. PubMed ID: 18300311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Good science and good peer reviewing: are they related?
    Cicchetti DV
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Jun; 20(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 9845169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigour and validity of research findings - a tale of two controversies.
    Robinson P
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Jun; 34(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 20618258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical conclusion validity and type IV errors in rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Feb; 73(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 1543405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine vs medicine-based evidence.
    Sethi NK; Sethi PK
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):592. PubMed ID: 18350575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariate tests of means in independent groups designs. Effects of covariance heterogeneity and nonnormality.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 14994559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
    Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.
    Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Truth, probability, and frameworks.
    Wren JD
    PLoS Med; 2005 Nov; 2(11):e361. PubMed ID: 16288554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying and assessing the null hypothesis.
    Luft HS
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Feb; 34(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 10654829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Roaming through methodology. XXXIV. Limitations of predictive models].
    Steyerberg EW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Sep; 145(37):1822-3. PubMed ID: 11582648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
    Pickler RH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological considerations with secondary analyses.
    Pollack CD
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 10876539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuropsychology and linguistic aphasiology: evidence in favor of case studies.
    Novaes C
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):362-4. PubMed ID: 15177814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tale of two nutritionists (or the importance of analysis plans).
    Ravichandran C; Fitzmaurice GM
    Nutrition; 2008; 24(11-12):1227-8. PubMed ID: 18619814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.