These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10515736)
21. Conducting clinical research and getting the report published. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 20188278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications]. Bias R Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Which is the best test for my data?]. Berger U Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2010 Nov; 60(11):457-8. PubMed ID: 21072723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals. Parent N; Hanley JA Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Pertinence of qualitative research: comparative approach in qualitative and quantitative research]. Corbalan JA Rech Soins Infirm; 2000 Jun; (61):13-22. PubMed ID: 12037858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Myths of neuropsychology: further considerations. Dodrill CB Clin Neuropsychol; 1999 Nov; 13(4):562-72. PubMed ID: 10806469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating outcomes versus "McAnswers"--where are we going? Jennings BM Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(4):144-6. PubMed ID: 10876538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Writing the methods. Coverdale J; Roberts L; Louie A; Beresin E Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 17021142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The qualitative research methodology. Saddler D Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimizing mistakes and embracing uncertainty. The PLoS Med; 2005 Aug; 2(8):e272. PubMed ID: 16120013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 18-24; 102(29):30-2. PubMed ID: 16895246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Upgrading our instructions for authors. Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism. Holmes TH Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2004 Apr; 286(4):E495-501. PubMed ID: 15010353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Morton JP Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]