These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10516859)

  • 1. How experience and training influence mammography expertise.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Orel SG; Sullivan DC; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Oct; 6(10):575-85. PubMed ID: 10516859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology resident mammography training: interpretation difficulty and error-making patterns.
    Grimm LJ; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):888-92. PubMed ID: 24928157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAD-aided mammogram training.
    Luo P; Qian W; Romilly P
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):1039-48. PubMed ID: 16087097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Resident Performance in Screening Mammography: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm.
    Lewis PJ; Rooney TB; Frazee TE; Poplack SP
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):659-664. PubMed ID: 29366681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Conant EF; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 17255410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training.
    Chen Y; James JJ; Turnbull AE; Gale AG
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3003-8. PubMed ID: 26037712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Breast Imaging Experience During Residency Translate Into Improved Initial Performance in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
    Zhang J; Grimm LJ; Lo JY; Johnson KS; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Mazurowski MA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jul; 12(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 26143567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Feb; 3(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8796654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?
    Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent-free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.
    Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Kickingereder P; Steudle F; Lederer W; Daniel H; Götz M; Gählert N; Tichy D; Wiesenfarth M; Laun FB; Maier-Hein KH; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):604-616. PubMed ID: 28152264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
    Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Feb; 95(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 12591984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.