223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10518232)
1. A 5-year clinical evaluation of Norplant implants in Senegal.
Ba MG; Moreau JC; Sokal D; Dunson R; Dao B; Kouedou D; Diadhiou F
Contraception; 1999 Jun; 59(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 10518232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience of Thai women in Bangkok with Norplant-2 implants.
Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Tang-Usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 9866003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Norplant subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
Tseng LH; Lee TY; Yang YS; Ko TM; Chuang SM
Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 8689883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptability of Norplant-2 rods as a method of family planning.
Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 1623717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
Peralta O; Diaz S; Croxatto H
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants. A 5-year study in the United States and Dominican Republic.
Sivin I; Alvarez F; Mishell DR; Darney P; Wan L; Brache V; Lacarra M; Klaisle C; Stern J
Contraception; 1998 Nov; 58(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 9883382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Menstrual bleeding patterns in Norplant-2 implant users.
Biswas A; Leong WP; Ratnam SS; Viegas OA
Contraception; 1996 Aug; 54(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8842585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
Buckshee K; Chatterjee P; Dhall GI; Hazra MN; Kodkany BS; Lalitha K; Logambal A; Manchanda P; Nanda UK; RaiChoudhury G
Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year evaluation of safety, efficacy and acceptability of Norplant implants in Nepal.
Chetri M; Bhatta A; Amatya RN; Lama H; Dunson TR; Spivey S; McMahan JH; Balogh S
Adv Contracept; 1996 Sep; 12(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 8910661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability of Norplant implants for fertility regulation in Singapore.
Singh K; Viegas OA; Fong YF; Ratnam SS
Contraception; 1992 Jan; 45(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 1591920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Norplant implants in a New York City clinic population.
Gerber S; Westhoff C; Lopez M; Gordon L
Contraception; 1994 Jun; 49(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 8070260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
