189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10518401)
41. Disparities in mean age and histopathologic grade between human papillomavirus type-specific early cervical neoplasms.
McLachlin CM; Shen LH; Sheets EE; Kozakewich H; Perlman SE; Tate JE; Crum CP
Hum Pathol; 1997 Nov; 28(11):1226-9. PubMed ID: 9385926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crum CP; McLachlin CM
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1995; 23():71-9. PubMed ID: 8747380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cervical cytopathology. An evaluation of its accuracy based on cytohistologic comparison.
DiBonito L; Falconieri G; Tomasic G; Colautti I; Bonifacio D; Dudine S
Cancer; 1993 Nov; 72(10):3002-6. PubMed ID: 8221568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H).
Simsir A; Ioffe O; Sun P; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Levine PH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 16355376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prevalence of Specific Types of Human Papiloma Virus in Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions and Cervical Cancer in Macedonian Women.
Aleksioska-Papestiev I; Chibisheva V; Micevska M; Dimitrov G
Med Arch; 2018 Feb; 72(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 29416214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Treatment of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cytologic evidence or biopsy results by board-certified gynecologists.
Lee C; Mancuso V; Contant T; Jackson R; Smith-Mccune K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 12634642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [The Papanicolaou classification in the Bethesda system (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland)].
Broso PR; Buffetti G
Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Nov; 45(11):557-63. PubMed ID: 8121604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Bethesda classification for squamous intraepithelial lesions: histologic, cytologic, and viral correlates.
Tabbara S; Saleh AD; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Taylor PT; Crum CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 1738511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cytology-based screening for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in women with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer.
Wohlmuth C; Ghorab Z; Shier M; Tinmouth J; Salit IE; Covens A; Zhang L; Vicus D
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Feb; 129(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 33002327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Some opinions for intraepithelial neoplasia in female genital duct].
Zhou XR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 46(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21429427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Value of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) Terminology in predicting cervical disease.
Hammes LS; Naud P; Passos EP; Matos J; Brouwers K; Rivoire W; Syrjänen KJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 17596761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot rule out high-grade lesion: Diagnosis, histological outcomes and human papillomavirus results.
Segura SE; Ramos-Rivera G; Hakima L; Suhrland M; Khader S
Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30187975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Cytological classification of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
Agamova KA; Nikitina NI; Gosh TE; Tikhomirova EE; Gladunova ZD
Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 3590668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Terms without borders: an international approach to terminology.
Herbert DA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Nov; 33(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16240399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Eosinophilic dysplasia of the cervix: a newly recognized variant of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ma L; Fisk JM; Zhang RR; Ulukus EC; Crum CP; Zheng W
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Nov; 28(11):1474-84. PubMed ID: 15489651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program.
Mittal S; Ghosh I; Banerjee D; Singh P; Biswas J; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Ray C; Basu P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 24947603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
