These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10518465)

  • 1. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M.
    Görner P; Fabriès JF; Duquenne P; Witschger O; Wrobel R
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16395458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling.
    Kenny LC; Stancliffe JD; Crook B; Stagg S; Griffiths WD; Stewart IW; Futter SJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):831-41. PubMed ID: 9866164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers.
    Kenny L; Chung K; Dilworth M; Hammond C; Wynn Jones J; Shreeve Z; Winton J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
    Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
    Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a passive aerosol sampler to size-selective pump samplers in indoor environments.
    Wagner J; Macher JM
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 14521436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.
    Sleeth DK; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 21985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.