These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10518906)

  • 1. National oral health survey Zimbabwe 1995: quality of restorations.
    Frencken JE; Sithole WD
    SADJ; 1998 Sep; 53(8):435-8. PubMed ID: 10518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restorative decision making by Ontario dentists.
    el-Mowafy OM; Lewis DW
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1994 Apr; 60(4):305-10, 313-6. PubMed ID: 8037797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009.
    O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation and experience of a new method for posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite restorations in the private practice--a survey.
    Tauböck TT; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jul; 70(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 21793644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and increased need for replacement of dental restorations: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Trachtenberg F; Maserejian NN; Tavares M; Soncini JA; Hayes C
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 18942597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan.
    Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY
    Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of local anesthesia in restorative treatment for adults in Finland.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Jun; 65(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 17514513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years.
    Lundin SA; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(5-6):165-71. PubMed ID: 10901600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rural and urban disparities in caries prevalence in children with unmet dental needs: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Maserejian NN; Tavares MA; Hayes C; Soncini JA; Trachtenberg FL
    J Public Health Dent; 2008; 68(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18179469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.