These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10518906)

  • 21. Longevity of posterior restorations.
    Mjör IA; Jokstad A; Qvist V
    Int Dent J; 1990 Feb; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 2407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with socio-demographic factors, dental caries, and oral hygiene in 12- to 14-year-old Tanzanian schoolchildren.
    Mtaya M; Brudvik P; Astrøm AN
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 19336630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cosmetic dental treatment in an adult Dutch population.
    Willemsen WL; Burgersdijk RC; Truin GJ; Mulder J
    Community Dent Health; 1994 Sep; 11(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 7953935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results.
    Wilson MA; Cowan AJ; Randall RC; Crisp RJ; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12216558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of gender and social factors on oral health, treatment degree and choice of dental restorative materials in patients from a dental school.
    Willershausen B; Witzel S; Schuster S; Kasaj A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 May; 8(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 20522134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Survival of single surface ART-restorations in Zimbabwe after 3 years].
    Frencken JE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Jun; 106(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11930476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention.
    Lucarotti PS; Holder RL; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2005 Nov; 33(10):805-15. PubMed ID: 16221519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Restorative material for children's teeth: preferences of parents and children.
    Peretz B; Ram D
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):243-8, 233. PubMed ID: 12613305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Oral and dental health of a population of school children from the Zou region of Benin (1998)].
    Moalic é ; Zérilli A; Capo-Chichi S; Apovi G
    Sante; 1999; 9(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 10657768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost of composite and glass ionomer class II molar restorations and theoretical analyses of cost per year of function at public dental services in Sweden.
    Sjögren P
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 17233326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.