226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10519086)
1. Molecular mechanism of retention in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and classification of modern stationary phases by using quantitative structure-retention relationships.
Kaliszan R; van Straten MA; Markuszewski M; Cramers CA; Claessens HA
J Chromatogr A; 1999 Sep; 855(2):455-86. PubMed ID: 10519086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative structure-retention relationships with model analytes as a means of an objective evaluation of chromatographic columns.
Ahmed Al-Haj M; Kaliszan R; Buszewski B
J Chromatogr Sci; 2001 Jan; 39(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 11206911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative characteristics of HPLC columns based on quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) and hydrophobic-subtraction model.
Baczek T; Kaliszan R; Novotná K; Jandera P
J Chromatogr A; 2005 May; 1075(1-2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15974124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative structure-retention relationships in comparative studies of behavior of stationary phases under high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography conditions.
Jiskra J; Claessens HA; Cramers CA; Kaliszan R
J Chromatogr A; 2002 Nov; 977(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 12456109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanism of separation on cholesterol-silica stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatography as revealed by analysis of quantitative structure-retention relationships.
Al-Haj MA; Haber P; Kaliszan R; Buszewski B; Jezierska M; Chilmonzyk Z
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1998 Dec; 18(4-5):721-8. PubMed ID: 9919974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prediction of
Liu X; Gao W; Liang C; Qiao J; Wang K; Lian H
Se Pu; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 34677018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of high-performance liquid chromatography stationary phases used for the separation of peptides in terms of quantitative structure-retention relationships.
Michel M; Baczek T; Studzińska S; Bodzioch K; Jonsson T; Kaliszan R; Buszewski B
J Chromatogr A; 2007 Dec; 1175(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 17980378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive approaches to gradient retention based on analyte structural descriptors from calculation chemistry.
Baczek T; Kaliszan R
J Chromatogr A; 2003 Feb; 987(1-2):29-37. PubMed ID: 12613794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chromatographic behaviour of ionic liquid cations in view of quantitative structure-retention relationship.
Molíková M; Markuszewski MJ; Kaliszan R; Jandera P
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Feb; 1217(8):1305-12. PubMed ID: 20060528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localised quantitative structure-retention relationship modelling for rapid method development in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography.
Park SH; De Pra M; Haddad PR; Grosse S; Pohl CA; Steiner F
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Jan; 1609():460508. PubMed ID: 31530383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of buffer salt types and non-counter ions of ion-pair reagents on the retention behavior of strongly ionized acid compounds in ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography].
Liu X; Gao W; Liang C; Qiao J; Wang K; Lian H
Se Pu; 2021 Sep; 39(9):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 34486842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of retention of pesticides in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: quantitative structure-retention relationships based on solute quantum-chemical descriptors and experimental (solvatochromic and spin-probe) mobile phase descriptors.
D'Archivio AA; Ruggieri F; Mazzeo P; Tettamanti E
Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Jun; 593(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 17543600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction and mechanism elucidation of analyte retention on phospholipid stationary phases (IAM-HPLC) by in silico calculated physico-chemical descriptors.
Russo G; Grumetto L; Barbato F; Vistoli G; Pedretti A
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2017 Mar; 99():173-184. PubMed ID: 27919703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test analytes for studies of the molecular mechanism of chromatographic separations by quantitative structure-retention relationships.
Al-Haj MA; Kaliszan R; Nasal A
Anal Chem; 1999 Aug; 71(15):2976-85. PubMed ID: 21662893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of variation in mobile phase pH and solute pK(a) with the change of organic modifier fraction on QSRRs of hydrophobicity and RP-HPLC retention of weakly acidic compounds.
Han SY; Liang C; Zou K; Qiao JQ; Lian HZ; Ge X
Talanta; 2012 Nov; 101():64-70. PubMed ID: 23158292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear solvation energy relationships in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Examination of RP-8 stationary phases for measuring lipophilicity parameters.
Altomare C; Cellamare S; Carotti A; Ferappi M
Farmaco; 1994 Jun; 49(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 8074782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High performance liquid chromatography as a molecular probe in quantitative structure-retention relationships studies of selected lipid classes on polar-embedded stationary phases.
Buszewski B; Walczak J; Skoczylas M; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Jan; 1585():105-112. PubMed ID: 30477718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of liquid chromatography retention factors for alpha-branched phenylsulfonyl acetates using quantum chemical descriptors.
Liu XH; Wu CD; Han SK; Wang LS
J Environ Sci (China); 2002 Apr; 14(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 12046281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Separation properties of novel and commercial polar stationary phases in hydrophilic interaction and reversed-phase liquid chromatography mode.
Wu J; Bicker W; Lindner W
J Sep Sci; 2008 May; 31(9):1492-503. PubMed ID: 18461572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention pattern profiling of fungal metabolites on mixed-mode reversed-phase/weak anion exchange stationary phases in comparison to reversed-phase and weak anion exchange separation materials by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry.
Apfelthaler E; Bicker W; Lämmerhofer M; Sulyok M; Krska R; Lindner W; Schuhmacher R
J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1191(1-2):171-81. PubMed ID: 18199445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
