These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10519314)

  • 1. A review of portal screen-film technology and five radiologists' evaluations of some existing products.
    Walker MA; Steinheimer DN; Weir VA; Homco LD; Green RW; Morris EL; Hess ME
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 10519314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.
    Langmack KA; Goss V
    Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):479-84. PubMed ID: 10505013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast improvement in a new radiotherapy imaging system.
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Gelosa S; Monti AF; Cacciatori M; Cazzaniga F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175(4):182-4. PubMed ID: 10230461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.
    Foulkes KM; Ostwald PM; Kron T
    Med Dosim; 2001; 26(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11704465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new verification film system for routine quality control of radiation fields: Kodak EC-L.
    Hermann A; Bratengeier K; Priske A; Flentje M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Jun; 176(6):274-7. PubMed ID: 10897254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of several Dupont portal film systems.
    Li H; Xu Z; Almond PR
    Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8899683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiological protection in equine radiography and radiotherapy.
    Yoxall AT
    Equine Vet J; 1977 Oct; 9(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 923543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved technique for obtaining teletherapy portal radiographs with high-energy photons.
    Galkin BM; Wu RK; Suntharalingam N
    Radiology; 1978 Jun; 127(3):828-30. PubMed ID: 96488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple modification of a radiation therapy table for portal film radiographs.
    Van Arsdale E
    Radiol Technol; 1983; 54(6):476-8. PubMed ID: 6647827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verification of quality parameters for portal images in radiotherapy.
    Pesznyák C; Polgár I; Weisz C; Király R; Zaránd P
    Radiol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 45(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 22933938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Adjustment of the film tension and the film=screen combination in the detection of low contrast in x-ray diagnosis. II: Interpretation of the results and clinical implications].
    Wust P; Hunger J; Claussen C; Felix R
    Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Jan; 43(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 2405504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the shielding characteristics of computed radiography cassettes.
    Potts R; Baker K; Bridge L
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 81(962):151-3. PubMed ID: 18238923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.