These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10520144)

  • 1. Surface roughness evaluation of resin modified glass-ionomers polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel.
    Geiger S; Ravchanukayev M; Liberman R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Sep; 26(9):704-9. PubMed ID: 10520144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8957918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials.
    Bouvier D; Duprez JP; Lissac M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):888-94. PubMed ID: 9467989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface texture evaluation of glass ionomer restorative materials polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel.
    Liberman R; Geiger S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Jan; 21(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 8133392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluoride uptake and release by composites and glass ionomers in a high caries challenge situation.
    Vieira AR; de Souza IP; Modesto A
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10477993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Yap AU; Sau CW; Lye KW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 9687119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material.
    Yap AU; Mok BY
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11933907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles.
    Xu HH; Eichmiller FC; Antonucci JM; Schumacher GE; Ives LK
    Dent Mater; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 10915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Kielbassa AM; Helwig E
    Dent Mater; 1995 Nov; 11(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 8595836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material.
    Warren DP; Colescott TD; Henson HA; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 12214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flouride release from various restorative materials.
    Bala O; Uçtaşli M; Can H; Türköz E; Can M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1997 Sep; 39(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 9354026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.
    Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid.
    Karantakis P; Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11203786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluoride, hydrogen ion and HEMA release from light-cured GIC restoratives.
    Kawai K; Takaoka T
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 12469750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.