138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10521728)
1. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison.
Owen J; Neely C; Northen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 10521728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging.
Hertzberg BS; Livingston E; DeLong DM; McNally PJ; Fazekas CK; Kliewer MA
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Oct; 20(10):1071-8; quiz 1080. PubMed ID: 11587014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography.
Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements.
Goldberg J; Newman RB; Rust PF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 9369833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of cervical cerclage outcome by endovaginal ultrasonography.
Andersen HF; Karimi A; Sakala EP; Kalugdan R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1102-6. PubMed ID: 7943079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Number and gestational age of prior preterm births does not modify the predictive value of a short cervix.
Yost NP; Owen J; Berghella V; Macpherson C; Swain M; Dildy GA; Miodovnik M; Langer O; Sibai B;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):241-6. PubMed ID: 15295373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth?
Owen J; Yost N; Berghella V; MacPherson C; Swain M; Dildy GA; Miodovnik M; Langer O; Sibai B;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):298-303. PubMed ID: 15295382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cervical length at 13-15 weeks' gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population?
Conoscenti G; Meir YJ; D'Ottavio G; Rustico MA; Pinzano R; Fischer-Tamaro L; Stampalija T; Natale R; Maso G; Mandruzzato G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12601832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying twin gestations at low risk for preterm birth with a transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation.
Imseis HM; Albert TA; Iams JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 177(5):1149-55. PubMed ID: 9396911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
Andersen HF; Nugent CE; Wanty SD; Hayashi RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):859-67. PubMed ID: 2206073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonographic Transabdominal Measurement of Uterine Cervical Length for the Prediction of a Midtrimester Short Cervix.
Guerby P; Beaudoin A; Marcoux G; Girard M; Pasquier JC; Bujold E
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Oct; 38(12):1303-1307. PubMed ID: 32521559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity?
Berghella V; Daly SF; Tolosa JE; DiVito MM; Chalmers R; Garg N; Bhullar A; Wapner RJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 10521734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation of cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation to demographic characteristics and obstetric history.
Palma-Dias RS; Fonseca MM; Stein NR; Schmidt AP; Magalhães JA
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 May; 37(5):737-44. PubMed ID: 15107937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.
Gomez R; Galasso M; Romero R; Mazor M; Sorokin Y; Gonçalves L; Treadwell M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):956-64. PubMed ID: 7943109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The correlation between transperineal sonography and digital examination in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix.
Richey SD; Ramin KD; Roberts SW; Ramin SM; Cox SM; Twickler DM
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):745-8. PubMed ID: 7724106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervix length and relaxin as predictors of preterm birth.
Davies G; Ottenhof C; Woodman M; Farley A; Julien N; Vugt DV; Day A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Dec; 30(12):1124-1131. PubMed ID: 19175964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 'virtual' cervical internal os: diagnosis during the first trimester of pregnancy.
Shalev J; Mashiach R; Bar-Chava I; Kaplan B; Bar J; Orvieto R; Meizner I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 12601835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
