These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1052211)

  • 1. Do nursing homes deserve the heat they've been getting?
    Soc Rehabil Rec; 1976 Dec-1977 Jan; 4(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 1052211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of care in nursing homes: an overview.
    Morrow G
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1975 Sep; 1(2):18-26. PubMed ID: 10309175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality care does have a price--even in nursing homes.
    Kerschner P
    Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):47. PubMed ID: 10281936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health care services in 100 superior nursing homes.
    Hay DG
    Long Term Care Health Serv Adm Q; 1977; 1(4):300-13. PubMed ID: 10305560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulating the quality of care in nursing homes in Australia and the United States of America.
    Phillips C; Spector WD
    Aust Health Rev; 1987; 10(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 10285615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perspectives. Nursing homes: quality concerns reappear.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Sep; 41(38):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10284654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nursing homes receive, poor marks for quality and safety.
    Med Health; 2006 Feb; 60(7):1, 5-7. PubMed ID: 16496453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the quality of nursing homes: regulation or competition?
    Nyman JA
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1987; 6(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 10301304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nursing homes embrace Internet.
    Saphir A
    Mod Healthc; 2000 Jan; 30(4):36. PubMed ID: 11009990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey measures nursing home quality. Not-for-profit homes received fewer citations for deficiencies than for-profits.
    Saphir A
    Mod Healthc; 1999 Jul; 29(27):12. PubMed ID: 10538938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Senate votes against changes in standards for nursing homes.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):4. PubMed ID: 10152134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nature of nursing homes.
    Hendricks C
    Emerg Med Serv; 2003 May; 32(5):44. PubMed ID: 12776410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures to bolster nursing home quality considered.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Aug; 17(17):72, 74. PubMed ID: 10283568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nursing homes seek funding assurances.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(40):24. PubMed ID: 10107200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Government should closely scrutinize quality of nursing home care--report.
    Fackelmann KA
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):46. PubMed ID: 10275214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First nursing homes, next managed care? Limiting liability in quality of care cases under the False Claims Act.
    Peterson KA
    Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 10791117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality care pyramid.
    Haley SW
    Nurs Homes Sr Citiz Care; 1988; 37(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10312662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sorry marks for nursing homes.
    Findlay S
    US News World Rep; 1988 Dec; 105(23):92-3. PubMed ID: 10291064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nursing homes worry about cost of implementing proposed rules.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(23):150. PubMed ID: 10284674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality care: a continuing exploration of options.
    Kerschner P
    Provider; 1986 Oct; 12(10):41-2. PubMed ID: 10279111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.