These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10522200)

  • 1. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 10522200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.
    Li G; Welander U; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 15070839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
    Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Matsuo T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12917286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography: improving image quality.
    Kutsch VK
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 16903533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction for attenuation and visual response in digital radiography.
    Welande U; Yoshiura K; Li G; Sällström P; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12076052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
    Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pseudo-color filter in two-dimensional imaging in dentistry].
    Kats L; Vered M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Oct; 31(4):13-5, 59. PubMed ID: 25549388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
    Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24170798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
    Samaras CD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 15585809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phosphor plate radiography: an integral component of the filmless practice.
    Benjamin S
    Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):89. PubMed ID: 21133024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.