These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10522202)

  • 1. Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images.
    Gotfredsen E; Kragskov J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10522202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography.
    Eppley BL; Sadove AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Oct; 49(10):1038-43. PubMed ID: 1890516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the craniofacial morphology in 2-month-old unoperated infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate, and unilateral incomplete cleft lip.
    Hermann NV; Jensen BL; Dahl E; Bolund S; Kreiborg S
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1999; 19(2):80-93. PubMed ID: 10416151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The automation of the processing and interpreting of teleroentgenograms].
    Zhulev EN; Pestrikova VN; Plekhanov AA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1998; 77(6):46-8. PubMed ID: 10067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
    Turner PJ; Weerakone S
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms.
    Macrì V; Wenzel A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 8500539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancing digital cephalic radiography with mixture models and local gamma correction.
    Frosio I; Ferrigno G; Borghese NA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 16398419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system: Part I.
    Lowey MN
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 20(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 8399053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital imaging in the assessment of facial deformity.
    Fanibunda KB; Thomas PR
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 37(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10371308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic Analysis of Lateral Cephalograms Based on Multiresolution Decision Tree Regression Voting.
    Wang S; Li H; Li J; Zhang Y; Zou B
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():1797502. PubMed ID: 30581546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric image analysis and measurement for orthognathic surgery.
    Yang J; Ling X; Lu Y; Wei M; Ding G
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 May; 39(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 11465880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing digital serial cephalogram images for growth or treatment changes.
    Ross LL; Munn MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 16102397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
    Cohen JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.