These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10522376)

  • 1. [Different techniques of reduction mammaplasty comparing clinical and esthetic complications with patient satisfaction].
    Stranz G; Petri E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 10522376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superior and superomedial pedicle wise-pattern reduction mammaplasty: maximizing cosmesis and minimizing complications.
    McCulley SJ; Schaverien MV
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19542877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty.
    Hamdi M; Greuse M; De Mey A; Webster MH
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11121316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transgender patient satisfaction following reduction mammaplasty.
    Nelson L; Whallett EJ; McGregor JC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Mar; 62(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 18083643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dermal suspension flaps for McKissock's vertical bipedicle flap vs. classical McKissock's technique: comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Menderes A; Mola F; Vayvada H; Yilmaz M; Baytekin C
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 15710116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of long-term outcome of 6 techniques of breast reduction].
    Tairych G; Worseg A; Kuzbari R; Deutinger M; Holle J
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2000 May; 32(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10929553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The crossed dermal flaps technique for breast reduction.
    de la Plaza R; de la Cruz L; Moreno C; Soto L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 15633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
    Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which technique for which breast? A prospective study of different techniques of reduction mammaplasty.
    Giovanoli P; Meuli-Simmen C; Meyer VE; Frey M
    Br J Plast Surg; 1999 Jan; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10343591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gynecomastia treatment with subareolar glandular pedicle. Discussion, 287.
    Celebioğlu S; Ertaş NM; Ozdil K; Oktem F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):281-6; discussion 287. PubMed ID: 15666043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The superior pedicle mammaplasty for the treatment of pedunculous breast.
    Papalia I; d'Alcontres FS; Colonna MR; Mojallal AM; Foyatier JL
    Ann Ital Chir; 2007; 78(6):503-6. PubMed ID: 18510030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue expansion after inverted-T mammaplasty: can it be performed successfully?
    Kilgo MS; Cordeiro PG; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 50(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 12783005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superior-medial dermoglandular pedicle reduction mammaplasty for immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: technical aspects and outcome.
    Munhoz AM; Montag E; Arruda EG; Aldrighi C; Gemperli R; Aldrighi JM; Ferreira MC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Nov; 57(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 17060729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty using different techniques.
    Chiummariello S; Cigna E; Buccheri EM; Dessy LA; Alfano C; Scuderi N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 17805921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reduction mammaplasty with a superior pedicle - a retrospective 10-year follow-up analysis of 33 patients].
    Schratt J; Binter A; Rab M
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 25412243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Long-term results of the reduction mammaplasty with Revers T-technique].
    Hyckel P; Robotta C; Thiel H; Schumann D
    Zentralbl Chir; 2001 Oct; 126(10):788-92. PubMed ID: 11727189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
    Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance.
    Erdogan B; Ayhan M; Deren O; Tuncel A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 12621566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the LeJour and Wise pattern methods of breast reduction.
    Kreithen J; Caffee H; Rosenberg J; Chin G; Clayman M; Lawson M; Seagle MB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):236-41; discussion 241-2. PubMed ID: 15725821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.