These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10524890)
1. The significance of prior benign needle biopsies in men subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Akingba G; Carter HB J Urol; 1999 Nov; 162(5):1649-52. PubMed ID: 10524890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors? Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration. Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer. Fowler JE; Bigler SA; Miles D; Yalkut DA J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 10687983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? Djavan B; Ravery V; Zlotta A; Dobronski P; Dobrovits M; Fakhari M; Seitz C; Susani M; Borkowski A; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1679-83. PubMed ID: 11586201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies. Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate specific antigen density correlates with features of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Kundu SD; Roehl KA; Yu X; Antenor JA; Suarez BK; Catalona WJ J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):505-9. PubMed ID: 17222621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers. Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. Djavan B; Mazal P; Zlotta A; Wammack R; Ravery V; Remzi M; Susani M; Borkowski A; Hruby S; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M Prostate; 2001 May; 47(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by additional sampling from the anterior lateral horns of the peripheral zone in combination with the standard sextant biopsy. Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 15157210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Graefen M; Haese A; Pichlmeier U; Hammerer PG; Noldus J; Butz K; Erbersdobler A; Henke RP; Michl U; Fernandez S; Huland H J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features. Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percent free prostate specific antigen in the total prostate specific antigen 2 to 4 ng./ml. range does not substantially increase the number of biopsies needed to detect clinically significant prostate cancer compared to the 4 to 10 ng./ml. range. Haese A; Dworschack RT; Partin AW J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 12131298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]