93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10525384)
1. Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology: routine or selective?
Chan YM; Cheung AN; Cheng DK; Ng TY; Ngan HY; Wong LC
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Nov; 75(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 10525384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Second opinion pathology in liver biopsy interpretation.
Bejarano PA; Koehler A; Sherman KE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 96(11):3158-64. PubMed ID: 11721765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outside slide review in gynecologic oncology: impact on patient care and treatment.
Eskander RN; Baruah J; Nayak R; Brueseke T; Ji T; Wardeh R; Tewari KS
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 May; 32(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 23518913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology.
Santoso JT; Coleman RL; Voet RL; Bernstein SG; Lifshitz S; Miller D
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 May; 91(5 Pt 1):730-4. PubMed ID: 9572220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytohistologic discrepancies: a means to improve pathology practice and patient outcomes.
Clary KM; Silverman JF; Liu Y; Sturgis CD; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 11939731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of Specialist Pathology Review in a Single Statewide Gynecologic Cancer Service.
Melon J; Leung Y; Salfinger SG; Tan J; Mohan G; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jan; 27(1):171-176. PubMed ID: 28002209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and economic impact of a clinical pathway for pap test utilization in Gynecologic Oncology practice.
Santillan A; Govan L; Zahurak ML; Diaz-Montes TP; Giuntoli RL; Bristow RE
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jun; 109(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 18405946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When is a pathology review indicated in endometrial cancer?
Kwon JS; Francis JA; Qiu F; Weir MM; Ettler HC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1224-30. PubMed ID: 18055713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance of second opinion pathology in gynecologic oncology.
Selman AE; Niemann TH; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 94(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 10432147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interinstitutional pathology consultations. A reassessment.
Weir MM; Jan E; Colgan TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Sep; 120(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 14502805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slide review in gynecologic oncology ensures completeness of reporting and diagnostic accuracy.
Khalifa MA; Dodge J; Covens A; Osborne R; Ackerman I
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 12893212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology. Analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations.
Arbiser ZK; Folpe AL; Weiss SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 116(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 11601130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Subtyping as a predictor of outcome.
Reuss E; Price J; Koonings P
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 11547641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary study concerning the cytoscreen system importance (liquid based cytology) in gynecologic cytology.
Popescu CF; Bădulescu A; Bădulescu F; Cotarcea S; Găvănescu M
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2005; 46(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16286981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy analysis, communication, and feedback for cytotechnologist quality improvement of nongynecologic cytopathology.
Whigham P; Ilario MJ; Flanagan MB; Mauser N; Raab SS; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Apr; 34(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 16544333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
