These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10525384)
41. The clinicopathological meeting. A means of auditing diagnostic performance. McBroom HM; Ramsay AD Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Jan; 17(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8447511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Rates of abnormalities and infectious agents in cervical smears from female inmates in Texas: comparison with private and university clinic patients. Logrono R; Wong JY Tex Med; 1999 Sep; 95(9):60-3. PubMed ID: 10518440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cervical biopsy/cytology correlation data can be collected prospectively and shared clinically. Cioc AM; Julius CJ; Proca DM; Tranovich VL; Keyhani-Rofagha S Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 11782088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Concordance of Expert Consultation Diagnoses in the Review of Pelvic Washing Specimens. Banet N; Levinson KL; VandenBussche CJ Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 26820245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ten problematical issues identified by pathology review for multidisciplinary gynaecological oncology meetings. McCluggage WG J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 22011450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Tumor board in gynecologic oncology. Santoso JT; Schwertner B; Coleman RL; Hannigan EV Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 15086716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Extra-departmental anatomic pathology expert consultation inTaiwan: a research grant supported 4-year experience. Hsu CY; Su IJ; Lin MC; Kuo TT; Jung SM; Ho DM J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 101(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 20119977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Discrepancy rates in liver biopsy reporting. Colling R; Verrill C; Fryer E; Wang LM; Fleming K J Clin Pathol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):825-7. PubMed ID: 24970902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Lymphoma diagnosis at an academic centre: rate of revision and impact on patient care. Bowen JM; Perry AM; Laurini JA; Smith LM; Klinetobe K; Bast M; Vose JM; Aoun P; Fu K; Greiner TC; Chan WC; Armitage JO; Weisenburger DD Br J Haematol; 2014 Jul; 166(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 24697285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The loss of pathological specimens: incidence and causes. Sandbank S; Klein D; Westreich M; Shalom A Dermatol Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1084-6. PubMed ID: 20533941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Institutional review of outside cytology materials: a retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiences. Layfield LJ; Jones C; Rowe L; Gopez EV Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11782087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Intraoperative consultation in gynecologic pathology: a 6-year audit at a tertiary care medical center. Ismiil N; Ghorab Z; Nofech-Mozes S; Plotkin A; Covens A; Osborne R; Kupets R; Khalifa MA Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jan; 19(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 19258958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The multidisciplinary tumor conference in gynecologic oncology--does it alter management? Cohen P; Tan AL; Penman A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Dec; 19(9):1470-2. PubMed ID: 19955920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Second-opinion pathologic review is a patient safety mechanism that helps reduce error and decrease waste. Middleton LP; Feeley TW; Albright HW; Walters R; Hamilton SH J Oncol Pract; 2014 Jul; 10(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 24695900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic discrepancies and their clinical impact in a neuropathology referral practice. Bruner JM; Inouye L; Fuller GN; Langford LA Cancer; 1997 Feb; 79(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 9024718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist. Kuijpers CC; Visser M; Sie-Go DM; de Leeuw H; de Rooij MJ; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M Virchows Arch; 2015 Jun; 466(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 25775953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pathology Reports: Discrepancy Patterns of Second Opinions in a Referral Cancer Center. Taraz Jamshidi S; Gharib M; Etemadi M; Jarahi L; Hosseini S; Ariamanesh M; Dehghani M Cancer Invest; 2023 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 36601856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessing the value of second opinion pathology review. Farooq A; Abdelkader A; Javakhishivili N; Moreno GA; Kuderer P; Polley M; Hunt B; Giorgadze TA; Jorns JM Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 33644816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]