218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10527009)
1. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.
Lukl J; Doupal V; Sovová E; Lubena L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients.
Crook B; Nijhof P; van der Kemp P; Jennison C
Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted physiological pacemakers.
Ishikawa T; Sumita S; Kikuchi M; Nakagawa T; Kosuge M; Kuji N; Kimura K; Tochikubo O; Usui T; Umemura S
Jpn Circ J; 2000 Jul; 64(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 10929778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chronotropic incompetence: a common and progressive finding in pacemaker patients.
Gwinn N; Leman R; Kratz J; White JK; Zile MR; Gillette P
Am Heart J; 1992 May; 123(5):1216-9. PubMed ID: 1575136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of chronotropic incompetence in the pacemaker patient population.
Melzer C; Witte J; Reibis R; Bondke HJ; Combs W; Stangl K; Baumann G; Theres H
Europace; 2006 Jan; 8(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16627413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Ricci R; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Spampinato A; Pignalberi C; Bellocci F; Adinolfi E; Dini P; Cavaglià S; De Seta F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1719-23. PubMed ID: 8945030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing.
Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Brandes A; Haase H; Katus HA; Potratz J
Heart; 1999 Jun; 81(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 10336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival and follow-up after pacemaker implantation: a comparison of patients with sick sinus syndrome, complete heart block, and atrial fibrillation.
Alt E; Völker R; Wirtzfeld A; Ulm K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Nov; 8(6):849-55. PubMed ID: 2415938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closed-loop stimulation as a physiological rate-modulated pacing approach based on intracardiac impedance to lower the atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation.
Ikeda S; Nogami A; Inoue K; Kowase S; Kurosaki K; Mukai Y; Tsutsui H
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32128918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation].
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Herz; 1998 Jun; 23(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 9690113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chronotropic response of an activity detecting pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node.
Moura PJ; Gessman LJ; Lai T; Gallagher JD; White M; Morse DP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):78-86. PubMed ID: 2436172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the chronotropic response at the anaerobic threshold: an objective measure of chronotropic function.
Meine M; Achtelik M; Hexamer M; Kloppe A; Werner J; Trappe HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 23(10 Pt 1):1457-67. PubMed ID: 11060865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
