BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10527649)

  • 1. Open questions on bioequivalence: some problems and some solutions.
    Marzo A
    Pharmacol Res; 1999 Oct; 40(4):357-68. PubMed ID: 10527649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical considerations into the new EMA guideline on bioequivalence.
    Marzo A; Fontana E
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2011; 61(4):207-20. PubMed ID: 21650079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptable and unacceptable procedures in bioavailability and bioequivalence trials.
    Marzo A; Ceppi Monti N
    Pharmacol Res; 1998 Nov; 38(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 9806821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability and impact on design of bioequivalence studies.
    Van Peer A
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 106(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 20041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioequivalence. An updated reappraisal addressed to applications of interchangeable multi-source pharmaceutical products.
    Marzo A; Balant LP
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1995 Feb; 45(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7710428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open questions in bioequivalence.
    Marzo A
    Pharmacol Res; 1995 Oct; 32(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 8866840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open questions on bioequivalence: an updated reappraisal.
    Marzo A
    Curr Clin Pharmacol; 2007 May; 2(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 18690864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmacokinetic analysis of bioequivalence trials: implications for sex-related issues in clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics.
    Chen ML; Lee SC; Ng MJ; Schuirmann DJ; Lesko LJ; Williams RL
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2000 Nov; 68(5):510-21. PubMed ID: 11103754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioavailability and bioequivalence trials: statistics & pharmacokinetic principles.
    Rajaram L; Roy SK; Skerjanec A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 103():159-79. PubMed ID: 15747918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: linear kinetics (I).
    Fernández-Teruel C; Nalda Molina R; González-Alvarez I; Navarro-Fontestad C; García-Arieta A; Casabó VG; Bermejo M
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Jan; 36(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 19028574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current regulatory approaches of bioequivalence testing.
    Karalis V; Macheras P
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 8(8):929-42. PubMed ID: 22681436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing bioequivalence using genomic data.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Li L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 15587969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the bioequivalence of analogues of endogenous substances ('endogenous drugs'): considerations to optimize study design.
    Dissanayake S
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 69(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 20233194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The new European Medicines Agency guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence.
    Morais JA; Lobato Mdo R
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 106(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 20070293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [What model for pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue distribution and bioequivalence?].
    Marzo A; Monti NC
    Boll Chim Farm; 1998 Mar; 137(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 9611844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New questions regarding bioequivalence of levothyroxine preparations: a clinician's response.
    Green WL
    AAPS J; 2005 Mar; 7(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 16146330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: Part II. Non-linear kinetics.
    Fernández-Teruel C; Gonzalez-Alvarez I; Navarro-Fontestad C; García-Arieta A; Bermejo M; Casabó VG
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Jan; 36(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 19038335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An area correction method to reduce intrasubject variability in bioequivalence studies.
    Abdallah HY
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 1998; 1(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 10945919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of pooled plasma samples as a predictor for proving bioequivalence of drugs with a long elimination half-life. The example of phenprocoumon.
    Gatchev E; Thyroff-Friesinger U; Bakracheva N; Kirkov V; Koytchev R; van der Meer MJ
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2004; 54(10):685-9. PubMed ID: 15553109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Harmonization of testing drugs for bioequivalence: problems and possible solutions].
    Zherdev VP; Kolyvanov GB; Litvin AA; Sariev AK
    Eksp Klin Farmakol; 2003; 66(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 12962051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.