These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10529525)
1. Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5-year longitudinal study in young adults. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B Caries Res; 1999; 33(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 10529525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B; Nyvad B Caries Res; 1998; 32(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 9577986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in approximal surfaces: Advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced modalities. Wenzel A Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 May; 72(4):251-64. PubMed ID: 24512205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical cavitation and radiographic lesion depth in proximal surfaces in an Indian population. Sansare K; Raghav M; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Wenzel A Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25220524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approximal caries prevalence in Danish recruits and progression of caries in the late teens: a retrospective radiographic study. Hintze H Caries Res; 2001; 35(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 11125193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnosis of caries on approximal surfaces of permanent teeth]. Mirska-Mietek M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2010; 56(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 21473003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters. Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children. Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 10460957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic Yield for Clinical Caries Diagnosis in Young Adults: Indicators for Radiographic Examination. Carvalho JC; Mestrinho HD; Guillet A; Maltz M Caries Res; 2020; 54(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32101874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Caries behaviour in Danish teenagers: a longitudinal radiographic study. Hintze H Int J Paediatr Dent; 1997 Dec; 7(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 9482028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of approximal caries in primary teeth: radiographic versus clinical examination using tooth separation. de Araujo FB; de Araujo DR; dos Santos CK; de Souza MA Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):54-6. PubMed ID: 9522685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic recognition and distribution of approximal carious lesions in New Zealand undergraduate dental students. Chandler NP; Ng BP; Monteith BD N Z Dent J; 2005 Dec; 101(4):106-9. PubMed ID: 16416748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents. Lunder N; von der Fehr FR Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8833139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study. Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plaque and gingival status as indicators for caries progression on approximal surfaces. Ekstrand KR; Bruun G; Bruun M Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9438570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age. Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of approximal caries: radiographic versus clinical examination using tooth separation. De Araujo FB; Rosito DB; Toigo E; dos Santos CK Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 1299248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience. Hintze H; Wenzel A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Part 1: the relationship between cavitation, radiographic lesion depth, the site-specific gingival index and the level of infection of the dentine. Ratledge DK; Kidd EA; Beighton D Caries Res; 2001; 35(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 11125189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children. Hintze H Caries Res; 1993; 27(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 8281566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]