142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10529865)
1. Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars.
el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(4):238-42, 228. PubMed ID: 10529865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique.
Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga.
Holan G; Fuks AB; Ketlz N
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 12064493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
