These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10530017)

  • 21. Comparison of procedures to determine electrical stimulation thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 11770674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A probabilistic Poisson-based model accounts for an extensive set of absolute auditory threshold measurements.
    Heil P; Matysiak A; Neubauer H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():135-161. PubMed ID: 28716582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2372-84. PubMed ID: 10491701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 8354754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
    Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of noise vocoding on gap detection thresholds.
    Zhang F; Blankenship C; Xiang J; Houston L; Samy R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 25941867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: within-channel and across-channel gap detection.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Krause JC; Debiase D; Carlson H
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21303227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance at different stimulus intensities with the within- and across-channel adaptive tests of temporal resolution.
    Hess BA; Blumsack JT; Ross ME; Brock RE
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):900-5. PubMed ID: 22957659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.
    Nelson PC; Carney LH
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 97(1):522-39. PubMed ID: 17079342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multichannel cochlear implant for selective neuronal activation and chronic use in the free-moving Mongolian gerbil.
    Wiegner A; Wright CG; Vollmer M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Nov; 273():40-54. PubMed ID: 27519925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
    Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):446-57. PubMed ID: 17614502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
    Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.