134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10530251)
1. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium instruments in molar root canal preparation.
Samyn JA; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 8935015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments.
Zelada G; Varela P; Martín B; Bahíllo JG; Magán F; Ahn S
J Endod; 2002 Jul; 28(7):540-2. PubMed ID: 12126386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
