These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10530251)

  • 21. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
    Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals.
    Taha NA; Ozawa T; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 20171378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study.
    Alomairy KH
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 19345805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
    Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Root canal preparation for obturation using nickel-titanium mechanical devices].
    Fazekas A
    Fogorv Sz; 1998; 91(8-9):241-6. PubMed ID: 9729665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 9641147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals.
    Hilaly Eid GE; Wanees Amin SA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 21862367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of nickel-titanium engine-driven instrument rotational speed on root canal morphology.
    Poulsen WB; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):609-12. PubMed ID: 8596082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
    Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.