BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10530401)

  • 1. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination.
    Pasqualotto EB; Daitch JA; Hendin BN; Falcone T; Thomas AJ; Nelson DR; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Oct; 16(9):476-82. PubMed ID: 10530401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prewash and postwash total progressively motile sperm counts have poor predictive value for clinical pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.
    Liu S; Chen Z; Wang H; Yang L; Ma C; Sun L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Jun; 153(3):476-482. PubMed ID: 33119129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postwash total motile sperm count: should it be included as a standard male infertility work up.
    Madbouly K; Isa A; Habous M; Almannie R; Abu-Rafea B; Binsaleh S
    Can J Urol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):8847-8852. PubMed ID: 28646941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How low is too low? Postwash total motile sperm count effect on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Mathes M; Kastrick E; Sayles H; Gustin S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 36357350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination.
    Shulman A; Hauser R; Lipitz S; Frenkel Y; Dor J; Bider D; Mashiach S; Yogev L; Yavetz H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1998 Jul; 15(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 9673883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of pregnancy rates in pre-treatment male infertility and low total motile sperm count at insemination.
    Xiao CW; Agbo C; Dahan MH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 293(1):211-217. PubMed ID: 26288981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis.
    van Weert JM; Repping S; Van Voorhis BJ; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 15374704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination.
    Miller DC; Hollenbeck BK; Smith GD; Randolph JF; Christman GM; Smith YR; Lebovic DI; Ohl DA
    Urology; 2002 Sep; 60(3):497-501. PubMed ID: 12350496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine insemination with double ejaculate compared with single ejaculate in male factor infertility: a pilot study.
    Küçük T; Sozen E; Buluc B
    J Androl; 2008; 29(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18390559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of patient and semen characteristics on live birth rates following intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study.
    Hendin BN; Falcone T; Hallak J; Nelson DR; Vemullapalli S; Goldberg J; Thomas AJ; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2000 May; 17(5):245-52. PubMed ID: 10976410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clarifying the relationship between total motile sperm counts and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates.
    Muthigi A; Jahandideh S; Bishop LA; Naeemi FK; Shipley SK; O'Brien JE; Shin PR; Devine K; Tanrikut C
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 33610321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of motile sperm count after swim-up on outcome of intrauterine insemination.
    Berg U; Brucker C; Berg FD
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Apr; 67(4):747-50. PubMed ID: 9093205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Sperm Morphology on Pregnancy Success via Intrauterine Insemination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kohn TP; Kohn JR; Ramasamy R
    J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):812-822. PubMed ID: 29129781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.
    Van Voorhis BJ; Barnett M; Sparks AE; Syrop CH; Rosenthal G; Dawson J
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):661-8. PubMed ID: 11287015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm.
    Dickey RP; Pyrzak R; Lu PY; Taylor SN; Rye PH
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Apr; 71(4):684-9. PubMed ID: 10202879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
    Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Sezer H; Celik S
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles.
    Stone BA; Vargyas JM; Ringler GE; Stein AL; Marrs RP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1522-34. PubMed ID: 10368500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Successful treatment of severe oligozoospermia with sperm washing and intrauterine insemination.
    Centola GM
    J Androl; 1997; 18(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 9283959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between processed total motile sperm count of husband or donor semen and pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination.
    Dong Fl; Sun Yp; Su Yc; Guo Yh; Hu Ll; Wang F
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2011 Oct; 57(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 21864206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Lemmens L; Kos S; Beijer C; Brinkman JW; van der Horst FA; van den Hoven L; Kieslinger DC; van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff NJ; Wolthuis A; Hendriks JC; Wetzels AM;
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1462-8. PubMed ID: 26930619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.