211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10531286)
1. The outer membrane of Brucella ovis shows increased permeability to hydrophobic probes and is more susceptible to cationic peptides than are the outer membranes of mutant rough Brucella abortus strains.
Freer E; Pizarro-Cerdá J; Weintraub A; Bengoechea JA; Moriyón I; Hultenby K; Gorvel JP; Moreno E
Infect Immun; 1999 Nov; 67(11):6181-6. PubMed ID: 10531286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brucella-Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chimeras are less permeable to hydrophobic probes and more sensitive to cationic peptides and EDTA than are their native Brucella sp. counterparts.
Freer E; Moreno E; Moriyón I; Pizarro-Cerdá J; Weintraub A; Gorvel JP
J Bacteriol; 1996 Oct; 178(20):5867-76. PubMed ID: 8830680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brucella abortus and its closest phylogenetic relative, Ochrobactrum spp., differ in outer membrane permeability and cationic peptide resistance.
Velasco J; Bengoechea JA; Brandenburg K; Lindner B; Seydel U; González D; Zähringer U; Moreno E; Moriyón I
Infect Immun; 2000 Jun; 68(6):3210-8. PubMed ID: 10816465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The outer membranes of Brucella spp. are resistant to bactericidal cationic peptides.
Martínez de Tejada G; Pizarro-Cerdá J; Moreno E; Moriyón I
Infect Immun; 1995 Aug; 63(8):3054-61. PubMed ID: 7622230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of the Omp25/Omp31 family in outer membrane properties and virulence of Brucella ovis.
Caro-Hernández P; Fernández-Lago L; de Miguel MJ; Martín-Martín AI; Cloeckaert A; Grilló MJ; Vizcaíno N
Infect Immun; 2007 Aug; 75(8):4050-61. PubMed ID: 17562767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immunochemical characterization of rough Brucella lipopolysaccharides.
Moreno E; Jones LM; Berman DT
Infect Immun; 1984 Mar; 43(3):779-82. PubMed ID: 6421737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outer membrane proteins from rough strains of four Brucella species.
Santos JM; Verstreate DR; Perera VY; Winter AJ
Infect Immun; 1984 Oct; 46(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 6480106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of magainin 2, cecropin, mastoparan and melittin on Brucella abortus.
Halling SM
Vet Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 51(1-2):187-92. PubMed ID: 8828135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The virB-encoded type IV secretion system is critical for establishment of infection and persistence of Brucella ovis infection in mice.
Sá JC; Silva TM; Costa EA; Silva AP; Tsolis RM; Paixão TA; Carvalho Neta AV; Santos RL
Vet Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 159(1-2):130-40. PubMed ID: 22483850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus BvrS/BvrR mutants contains lipid A modifications and has higher affinity for bactericidal cationic peptides.
Manterola L; Moriyón I; Moreno E; Sola-Landa A; Weiss DS; Koch MH; Howe J; Brandenburg K; López-Goñi I
J Bacteriol; 2005 Aug; 187(16):5631-9. PubMed ID: 16077108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transposon-derived Brucella abortus rough mutants are attenuated and exhibit reduced intracellular survival.
Allen CA; Adams LG; Ficht TA
Infect Immun; 1998 Mar; 66(3):1008-16. PubMed ID: 9488389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro susceptibility of Brucella to various antibiotics.
Hall WH; Manion RE
Appl Microbiol; 1970 Oct; 20(4):600-4. PubMed ID: 4993358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of antibiotics contained in two Brucella selective media on growth of Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, and B. ovis.
Marín CM; Alabart JL; Blasco JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 34(2):426-8. PubMed ID: 8789029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in the outer membrane-related properties of the six classical Brucella species.
Martín-Martín AI; Sancho P; Tejedor C; Fernández-Lago L; Vizcaíno N
Vet J; 2011 Jul; 189(1):103-5. PubMed ID: 20576453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rough lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus RB51 as a common antigen for serological detection of B. ovis, B. canis, and B. abortus RB51 exposure using indirect enzyme immunoassay and fluorescence polarization assay.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Conde S; Draghi de Benitez G; Gall D; Halbert G; Kenny K; Massengill C; Muenks Q; Rojas X; Perez B; Samartino L; Silva P; Tollersrud T; Jolley M
J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2004; 25(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 15162920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Entry and intracellular localization of Brucella spp. in Vero cells: fluorescence and electron microscopy.
Detilleux PG; Deyoe BL; Cheville NF
Vet Pathol; 1990 Sep; 27(5):317-28. PubMed ID: 2122572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The outer membranes of Brucella spp. are not barriers to hydrophobic permeants.
Martínez de Tejada G; Moriyón I
J Bacteriol; 1993 Aug; 175(16):5273-5. PubMed ID: 8349567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of lymphocyte responsiveness by the outer membrane-peptidoglycan complex of rough strains of Brucella abortus.
Smith R; Adams LG; Sowa BA; Ficht TA
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 1990 Sep; 26(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 2123582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunochemical characterization of Brucella lipopolysaccharides and polysaccharides.
Moreno E; Speth SL; Jones LM; Berman DT
Infect Immun; 1981 Jan; 31(1):214-22. PubMed ID: 6163716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Carbonic Anhydrase Pseudogene Sensitizes Select
Varesio LM; Willett JW; Fiebig A; Crosson S
J Bacteriol; 2019 Nov; 201(22):. PubMed ID: 31481543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
