423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10531658)
1. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
Astley SL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
Sutton JE; Roberts WA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
Grant DS
Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
McDevitt MA; Bell MC
Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator.
Astley SL; Peissig JJ; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):252-68. PubMed ID: 11497324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A relational differential outcomes effect: pigeons can classify outcomes as "good" and "better".
Friedrich AM; Zentall TR
Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 19779744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Velocity-based motion categorization by pigeons.
Cook RG; Beale K; Koban A
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The capacity for transitive inference in birds: the solving of the Gillan test by Corvidae and pigeons].
Zorina ZA; Kalinina TS; Markina NV
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1995; 45(4):716-22. PubMed ID: 8540255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columba livia): transfer from color to shape.
Lombardi CM
Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17516101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further evidence of a sensory-tonic interaction in pigeons.
Thomas DR; Lyons J
J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 5645873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value transfer across odor stimuli using probability of reinforcement in the rat.
Kaiser DH; Means L
Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 16781086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Choice between probability and value of alimentary reinforcement as means for revealing individual typological features of dog behavior].
Chilingarian LI
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2005; 55(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 15828420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
Mazur JE
Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.
Kyonka EG; Grace RC
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):392-408. PubMed ID: 17924788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of prefrontal ablations on the reaction of the active choice of feeder under different probability and value of the reinforcement on dog].
Preobrazhenskaia LA; Ioffe ME; Mats VN
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2004; 54(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 15326957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.
DeLong RE; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 7288370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The individual characteristics of dogs with a free choice of the probability and value of food reinforcement].
Preobrazhenskiĭ LA
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1997; 47(3):487-99. PubMed ID: 9273788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
