These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10531740)

  • 21. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
    Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.
    Piermatti J; Yousef H; Luke A; Mahevich R; Weiner S
    Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 17172962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
    Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.
    Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7615325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report.
    Aparicio C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 9497709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
    Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An abutment screw loosening study of a Diamond Like Carbon-coated CP titanium implant.
    Kim SK; Lee JB; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Lee KR; Cho LR; Lee SS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 May; 32(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 15842243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method.
    Tricio J; Laohapand P; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7615316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
    May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of preload values in gold and titanium dental implant retaining screws.
    Doolabh R; Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
    SADJ; 2014 Aug; 69(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 26548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.