534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10531743)
1. Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxilla: a 12-year retrospective study.
Keller EE; Tolman DE; Eckert SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):707-21. PubMed ID: 10531743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts and implants for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-stage procedure.
Kahnberg KE; Nilsson P; Rasmusson L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 10453674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endosseous implant and autogenous bone graft reconstruction of mandibular discontinuity: a 12-year longitudinal study of 31 patients.
Keller EE; Tolman D; Eckert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 9857587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-stage maxillary sinus reconstruction with endosseous implants: a prospective study.
Blomqvist JE; Alberius P; Isaksson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 9857586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: a 3- to 5-year follow-up clinical report.
Widmark G; Andersson B; Carlsson GE; Lindvall AM; Ivanoff CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 11280365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
Fermergård R; Astrand P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.
Keller EE; Tolman DE; Eckert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 10212536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective analysis of one-stage maxillary sinus augmentation with endosseous implants.
Blomqvist JE; Alberius P; Isaksson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):512-21. PubMed ID: 8803347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized study of 1- and 2-stage sinus inlay bone grafts: 1-year follow-up.
Wannfors K; Johansson B; Hallman M; Strandkvist T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 11055129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Brånemark implant system.
Lekholm U; Wannfors K; Isaksson S; Adielsson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 28(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 10355938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A histomorphometric comparison of the bone graft-titanium interface between interpositional and onlay/inlay bone grafting techniques.
Sjöström M; Lundgren S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 16519182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
Jensen OT; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 9714958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
