189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10531744)
1. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits.
Baker D; London RM; O'Neal R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 10531744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants.
Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates (Papio ursinus) and humans: histological evaluation.
Mangano C; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Mangano F; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18390239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined-surfaced titanium implants in membrane-covered critical-sized defects: a histologic and histometric study in dogs.
Veis AA; Papadimitriou S; Trisi P; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Kenealy JN
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17348879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early bone healing and biomechanical fixation of dual acid-etched and as-machined implants with healing chambers: an experimental study in dogs.
Bonfante EA; Granato R; Marin C; Suzuki M; Oliveira SR; Giro G; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 21365041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla.
Trisi P; Lazzara R; Rebaudi A; Rao W; Testori T; Porter SS
J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):945-56. PubMed ID: 12931756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.
Vernino AR; Kohles SS; Holt RA; Lee HM; Caudill RF; Kenealy JN
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12212687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
