BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10532161)

  • 1. An ex-vivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding.
    O'Reilly D; Dowling PA; Lagerstrom L; Swartz ML
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Sep; 26(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10532161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types.
    Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
    Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction.
    Hamdan A; Rock P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 18658140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.
    Budd S; Daskalogiannakis J; Tompson BD
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 18974067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance.
    Moore MM; Harrington E; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 26(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15650066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.