These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10532572)

  • 1. Evaluation of methods for assessing visual function of infants.
    Prager TC; Zou YL; Jensen CL; Fraley JK; Anderson RE; Heird WC
    J AAPOS; 1999 Oct; 3(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 10532572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which ocular and neurologic conditions cause disparate results in visual acuity scores recorded with visually evoked potential and teller acuity cards?
    Westall CA; Ainsworth JR; Buncic JR
    J AAPOS; 2000 Oct; 4(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 11040480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of measures of visual acuity in infants: Teller acuity cards and sweep visual evoked potentials.
    Riddell PM; Ladenheim B; Mast J; Catalano T; Nobile R; Hainline L
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Sep; 74(9):702-7. PubMed ID: 9380367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age norms for monocular grating acuity measured by sweep-VEP in the first three years of age.
    Salomão SR; Ejzenbaum F; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 18797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.
    Polevoy C; Muckle G; Séguin JR; Ouellet E; Saint-Amour D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 28220265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of swept visual evoked potential measurements of infant visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
    Lauritzen L; Jørgensen MH; Michaelsen KF
    Pediatr Res; 2004 Apr; 55(4):701-8. PubMed ID: 14739364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early visual-evoked potential acuity and future behavioral acuity in cortical visual impairment.
    Watson T; Orel-Bixler D; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 87(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 20016393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract.
    Thompson DA; Møller H; Russell-Eggitt I; Kriss A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 80(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 8942375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual sensory and ocular motor function in children with polymicrogyria: relationship to magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kelly JP; Ishak GE; Phillips JO; Nguyen H; Weiss AH
    J AAPOS; 2016 Feb; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 26917070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; McCulloch D; Herbert AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 39(13):2759-68. PubMed ID: 9856787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infant VEP and preferential looking acuity measured with phase alternating gratings.
    Sokol S; Moskowitz A; McCormack G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 33(11):3156-61. PubMed ID: 1399421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. VEP vernier, VEP grating, and behavioral grating acuity in patients with cortical visual impairment.
    Watson T; Orel-Bixler D; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19390471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique.
    Mackay AM; Bradnam MS; Hamilton R; Elliot AT; Dutton GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):438-41. PubMed ID: 18172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP].
    Wesemann W; Norcia AM; Manny RE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Jan; 208(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8839339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.
    Kelly JP; Phillips JO; Weiss AH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):159-169. PubMed ID: 27882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver agreement for measurement of grating acuity and interocular acuity differences with the teller acuity card procedure.
    Mash C; Dobson V; Carpenter N
    Vision Res; 1995 Jan; 35(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 7839625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.