490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10533404)
21. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
Kamisawa T; Okamoto T
JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors affecting the diameters of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Neoptolemos JP; Carr-Locke DL; Kelly KA
Hepatogastroenterology; 1991 Jun; 38(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 1937364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections.
Raptopoulos V; Prassopoulos P; Chuttani R; McNicholas MM; McKee JD; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 9577475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography--a 4-year retrospective study].
Mala T; Lunde OC; Nesbakken A; Aadland E; Stiris M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Feb; 120(5):560-2. PubMed ID: 10833912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A new method of noninvasive biliopancreatic diagnosis].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Sarrantonio A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1995 Oct; 90(4):438-43. PubMed ID: 8552821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Bret PM; Reinhold C
Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):472-86. PubMed ID: 9342565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance in the assessment of pancreatic ducts].
Pavone P; Panebianco V; Laghi A; Catalano C; Messina A; Lobina L; Pirillo S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997; 94(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 9424654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
Vrachliotis TG; Shirkhoda A; Bis KG; Shetty AN; Konez O; Ference JJ; Madrazo BL
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Aug; 38(4):295-323. PubMed ID: 9376087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic efficacy of non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Kuo YT; Jaw TS; Wang CK; Lee LW; Shen PC; Liu GC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Feb; 98(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10083764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Secretin stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diseases of the biliary and pancreatic ducts].
Hellund JC; Geitung JT; Meo AM; Angelsen JH; Munkvik M; Trondsen E; Buanes T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Mar; 122(7):691-4. PubMed ID: 11998731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after acute pancreatitis.
Lee MJ; Choi TK; Lai EC; Wong KP; Ngan H; Wong J
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Oct; 163(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 3764640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Soto JA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18425544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Mitake M; Okamura S; Ohashi S; Urano F; Simodaira M; Kanamori S; Ohyama I; Okada N; Segawa K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2885-9. PubMed ID: 9847615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
