These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10533423)
1. [Is quality assurance of registration and publishing of therapeutic results sufficient?]. Jørgensen JJ Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3342. PubMed ID: 10533423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Registration of surgical wound infections. A neglected quality assurance and evaluation activity in Norwegian hospitals]. Lystad A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Oct; 111(24):2934-5. PubMed ID: 1948893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use of data from the SINTEF-NIS for evaluation of therapeutic quality at Norwegian hospitals]. Steinum O Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Sep; 115(23):2948. PubMed ID: 7570523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is registration of multiple myeloma in the Norwegian Cancer Registry good enough?]. Aasbrenn M; Langmark F; Wisløff F Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2712-4. PubMed ID: 19079417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Think of a number!]. Alfsen GC Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Aug; 130(16):1594. PubMed ID: 20805847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assuring the quality of cancer registration in Rhode Island. Evaluation of early returns indicates future measures for enhancing reliability. Fulton JP; Buechner JS; Stanis D; Raimondo M R I Med J (1976); 1988 Sep; 71(9):337-46. PubMed ID: 3187325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Focus on quality improvement, now also in research]. Holm HA Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jun; 129(12):1236. PubMed ID: 19521449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical quality databases 2003. Handling of cases and evaluation of the year's applications]. Lidegaard Ø; Utzon J; Nørgaard L; Møller TW Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(39):3737-40. PubMed ID: 14558389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Registry-based quality development in health care]. Melsom H; Hannisdal E; Olsen B Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Aug; 115(18):2234-5. PubMed ID: 7652717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable? Dahl T; Rudjord K; Altreuther M; Myhre HO Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 31(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 16387520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Time to establish a national registry of cardiovascular diseases]. Lie M; Iversen SG; Tell GS; Njølstad I Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Feb; 124(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 14963514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [About quality registries: are we afraid the results will not be the ones we wanted?]. Thernlund G Lakartidningen; 2009 May 20-Jun 2; 106(21-22):1496; author reply 1496. PubMed ID: 19579441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A group of experts examines the quality of national registries]. Orn P Lakartidningen; 1996 Jul; 93(30-31):2639. PubMed ID: 8778509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [More general practitioners are needed for clever quality registries]. Andersson O Lakartidningen; 2009 Sep 23-29; 106(39):2428-9. PubMed ID: 19852160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assessment of autologous hematopoietic blood progenitor and stem cell grafting: a prospective registration study. Johnsen HE; Lanza F J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2002; 16(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 12597644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]