155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10533930)
1. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Metz CE
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95. PubMed ID: 10533930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
Acad Radiol; 1995 Oct; 2(10):841-50. PubMed ID: 9419649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Bick U; Lu P; Wolverton DE; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1569-79. PubMed ID: 8551981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: analysis of spiculation.
Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Cancer Lett; 1994 Mar; 77(2-3):201-11. PubMed ID: 8168067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of benign and malignant masses based on Zernike moments.
Tahmasbi A; Saki F; Shokouhi SB
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Aug; 41(8):726-35. PubMed ID: 21722886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features.
Joo S; Yang YS; Moon WK; Kim HC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1292-300. PubMed ID: 15493696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Yun AJ; Sullivan DC; Kornguth PJ
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(11):2944-8. PubMed ID: 7954258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Wolverton DE; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1077-84. PubMed ID: 11131052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multiple circular path convolution neural network system for detection of mammographic masses.
Lo SC; Li H; Wang Y; Kinnard L; Freedman MT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Feb; 21(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11929102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An automatic method for the identification and interpretation of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Schmidt F; Sorantin E; Szepesvàri C; Graif E; Becker M; Mayer H; Hartwagner K
Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1231-43. PubMed ID: 10368015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2295-304. PubMed ID: 16121585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
