These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10534038)

  • 1. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization.
    Totten VY; Sugarman DB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 10534038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
    Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of perceived pain with different immobilization techniques.
    Cross DA; Baskerville J
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2001; 5(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 11446541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated.
    Chan D; Goldberg RM; Mason J; Chan L
    J Emerg Med; 1996; 14(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 8782022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.
    Lerner EB; Billittier AJ; Moscati RM
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1998; 2(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9709329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization.
    Hamilton RS; Pons PT
    J Emerg Med; 1996; 14(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 8933314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
    Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR
    J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial.
    Mahshidfar B; Mofidi M; Yari AR; Mehrsorosh S
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Oct; 28(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 23746392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation.
    Luscombe MD; Williams JL
    Emerg Med J; 2003 Sep; 20(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 12954698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization.
    Johnson DR; Hauswald M; Stockhoff C
    Am J Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 14(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 8768157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion After Immobilization With a Traditional Spine Board and Full-Body Vacuum-Mattress Splint.
    Etier BE; Norte GE; Gleason MM; Richter DL; Pugh KF; Thomson KB; Slater LV; Hart JM; Brockmeier SF; Diduch DR
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 5(12):2325967117744757. PubMed ID: 29318167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximizing comfort and minimizing ischemia: a comparison of four methods of spinal immobilization.
    Hauswald M; Hsu M; Stockoff C
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 10895921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in healthy volunteer individuals.
    Ay D; Aktaş C; Yeşilyurt S; Sarıkaya S; Cetin A; Ozdoğan ES
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2011 Mar; 17(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21644085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of prehospital spinal immobilization: a systematic review of randomized trials on healthy subjects.
    Kwan I; Bunn F
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2005; 20(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15748015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study.
    Ms R; Riffelmann M; Kunze-Szikszay N; Lier M; Schmid O; Haus H; Schneider S; Jf H
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):46. PubMed ID: 33706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure ulcers from spinal immobilization in trauma patients: a systematic review.
    Ham W; Schoonhoven L; Schuurmans MJ; Leenen LP
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2014 Apr; 76(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 24662882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spinal immobilization at 20° on respiratory functions.
    Akkuş Ş; Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Çevik Y; Akıncı E; Uzunosmanoğlu H
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1959-1962. PubMed ID: 27422216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board.
    Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML
    Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintaining immobilization devices on trauma patients during chest and pelvic X-ray: a feasibility study.
    Stokkeland PJ; Andersen E; Bjørndal MM; Moen AI; Aslaksen S; Grasaas-Albrecht CP; Hyldmo PK
    Acta Radiol; 2022 May; 63(5):692-697. PubMed ID: 33906416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The long spine board does not reduce lateral motion during transport--a randomized healthy volunteer crossover trial.
    Wampler DA; Pineda C; Polk J; Kidd E; Leboeuf D; Flores M; Shown M; Kharod C; Stewart RM; Cooley C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 34(4):717-21. PubMed ID: 26827233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.