BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10534359)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: quality of design is not the only relevant variable.
    Berk PD; Sacks HS
    Hepatology; 1999 Nov; 30(5):1332-4. PubMed ID: 10534359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials.
    Reid CM; Ryan P; Miles H; Willson K; Beilin LJ; Brown MA; Jennings GL; Johnston CI; Macdonald GJ; Marley JE; McNeil JJ; Morgan TO; West MJ; Wing LM
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16036492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
    Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.
    James KE; Bloch DA; Lee KK; Kraemer HC; Fuller RK
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1421-34. PubMed ID: 8841652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of oral implants.
    Esposito M; Coulthard P; Worthington HV; Jokstad A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):783-92. PubMed ID: 11769828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control and quality assurance in HIV prevention research: model from a multisite HIV prevention trial. NIMH Multisite HIV Prevention Trial.
    AIDS; 1997 Dec; 11 Suppl 2():S49-53. PubMed ID: 9475711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
    Rosner A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What's the rush? Internal validity is not a trivial pursuit.
    Kovach CR
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2010 Jan; 3(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 20128537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials evaluating mortality in intensive care: doomed to fail?
    Ospina-Tascón GA; Büchele GL; Vincent JL
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1311-22. PubMed ID: 18379260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain.
    Koes BW; Malmivaara A; van Tulder MW
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 15949774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity].
    Liu XM; Zhang MM; Du L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 15171560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation.
    Pengel LH; Barcena L; Morris PJ
    Transpl Int; 2009 Apr; 22(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 19000234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.
    Klassen TP; Pham B; Lawson ML; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16018911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Designing an acupuncture study to meet evidence-based medical criteria: methodological considerations for logistic design and development of treatment interventions arising from the German randomized controlled acupuncture trial on chronic shoulder pain (GRASP).
    Molsberger AF; Mau J; Gotthardt H; Schneider T; Drabik A
    Eur J Med Res; 2004 Aug; 9(8):405-11. PubMed ID: 15337631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The (lack of) quality in assessing the quality of transplantation trials.
    Berger VW
    Transpl Int; 2009 Oct; 22(10):1029; author reply 1023. PubMed ID: 19497066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement.
    Welk B; Afshar K; MacNeily AE
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):306-9; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 16753430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical and technical quality assurance in the CHARTWEL-Bronchus trial.
    Lehmann D; Leetz HK; Hodapp N; Voigtmann Dagger L; Herrmann T; Baumann M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Mar; 179(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 12627257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
    Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishing the experimenting society: the historical origin of social experimentation according to the randomized controlled design.
    Dehue T
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(2):283-302. PubMed ID: 11430152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lessons learned from a clinical trial.
    Armstrong PW; Newby LK; Granger CB; Lee KL; Simes RJ; Van de Werf F; White HD; Califf RM;
    Circulation; 2004 Dec; 110(23):3610-4. PubMed ID: 15583090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.