These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10534977)

  • 21. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
    So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maxillomandibular plane angle bisector (MM) adjunctive to occlusal plane to evaluate anteroposterior measurement of dental base.
    Ganiger CR; Nayak US; Cariappa KU; Ahammed AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 23151706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
    Wellens H
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Maxilla-Mandibular Discrepancies through Soft-Tissue References: Reliability and Validation of the Anteroposterior Measurement.
    Maspero C; Cenzato N; Inchingolo F; Cagetti MG; Isola G; Sozzi D; Del Fabbro M; Tartaglia GM
    Children (Basel); 2023 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 36980017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 3189246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle.
    Rotberg S; Fried N; Kane J; Shapiro E
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 6930164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric Floating Norms for the
    Perinetti G; Ceschi M; Scalia A; Contardo L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8740731. PubMed ID: 29850584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy.
    Almaqrami BS; Alhammadi MS; Cao B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e352-e360. PubMed ID: 29750096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
    Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of successful chincup therapy in skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ko YI; Baek SH; Mah J; Yang WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 15224056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements.
    Oktay H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Feb; 99(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1990821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.