These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10534991)

  • 1. The mechanical advantage of the masseter muscle in subjects with different vertical and sagittal facial morphology.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Sartori M; Ciusa V
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Aug; 2(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 10534991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
    Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
    Hannam AG; Wood WW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology.
    van Spronsen PH; Koolstra JH; van Ginkel FC; Weijs WA; Valk J; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):313-28. PubMed ID: 9239960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
    Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Ueda HM; Ishizuka Y; Miyamoto K; Morimoto N; Tanne K
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Jun; 68(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 9622760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplified cephalometric lines for the estimation of muscular lines of action.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Colombo A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10337250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between dimensions of muscles of mastication (masseter and lateral pterygoid) and skeletal dimensions: study of 40 cases.
    Azaroual MF; Fikri M; Abouqal R; Benyahya H; Zaoui F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 24156908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns.
    García-Morales P; Buschang PH; Throckmorton GS; English JD
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 12831216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric analysis of masseter muscle and dentoskeletal morphology in dentate and edentulous humans.
    Kasai K; Richards LC; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1997 Jun; 39(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 9293704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies.
    Rowlerson A; Raoul G; Daniel Y; Close J; Maurage CA; Ferri J; Sciote JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15643413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of masseter muscles in relation to treatment with removable bite-blocks in dolichofacial growing subjects: A prospective controlled study.
    Lione R; Kiliaridis S; Noviello A; Franchi L; Antonarakis GS; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 28554451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Jaw muscle orientation and moment arms of long-face and normal adults.
    van Spronsen PH; Weijs WA; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    J Dent Res; 1996 Jun; 75(6):1372-80. PubMed ID: 8831632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the mechanical advantage of the masseter and temporal muscles following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Mavreas D; Melsen B
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 9511492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in cross-sectional measurements of masseter, medial pterygoid muscles, ramus, condyle and occlusal force after bi-maxillary surgery.
    Takayama A; Ueki K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Sato M; Yoshizawa K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 30691943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contributions of facial morphology, age, and gender to EMG activity under biting and resting conditions: a canonical correlation analysis.
    Fogle LL; Glaros AG
    J Dent Res; 1995 Aug; 74(8):1496-500. PubMed ID: 7560405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.