These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10535334)
21. Small for gestational age newborns--does pre-recognition make a difference in pregnancy outcome? Aviram A; Yogev Y; Bardin R; Meizner I; Wiznitzer A; Hadar E J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Sep; 28(13):1520-4. PubMed ID: 25259753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Possibility of predicting intrauterine fetal growth retardation by a single ultrasonic examination (using varying standards)]. Fedorova MV; Kotov IuB; Lukashenko SIu; Alekseevskiĭ AV; Dub NV; Sichinava LG; Novikova SV; Klimenko PA Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 May; (5):15-9. PubMed ID: 1897665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth. Hiersch L; Melamed N Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S700-S711.e1. PubMed ID: 29422209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch. Thorsell M; Kaijser M; Almström H; Andolf E BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 18333938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study: another perspective. DeVore GR Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 8090403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultrasound and genetic features of a term triploid pregnancy. Wasserman SA; Bofinger MK; Saldana LR Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):398-401. PubMed ID: 1814305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ultrasonic evaluation of the isovolumic relaxation time of the human fetal heart]. Tsyv'ian PB; Malkin KV Fiziol Cheloveka; 1997; 23(3):48-52. PubMed ID: 9264948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Analysis of erroneous prediction of fetal weight based on prenatal ultrasonography]. Belousov MA; Titchenko LI Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 May; (5):19-22. PubMed ID: 1897666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Validity of Doppler findings with reference to fetal outcome]. Steiner H; Schaffer H; Lassmann R; Batka M; Staudach A Gynakol Rundsch; 1991; 31 Suppl 2():99-104. PubMed ID: 1791003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Growth disturbances: risk of intrauterine growth retardation. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Finberg H; Mendelson E; Böhm-Vélez M; Bree R; Fishman EK; Hricak H; Laing F; Sartoris D; Thurmond A; Goldstein S Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():915-24. PubMed ID: 11037517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abnormal skull shape in intrauterine growth retardation: report of two cases. Partrick ME; Baker ER; Crow HC J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Feb; 18(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 10206811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Making best and appropriate use of fetal biophysical and Doppler ultrasound data in the management of the growth restricted fetus. Harrington KF Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 11169321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound. Weighing the propaganda against the facts. Beech BL Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (51):31-3. PubMed ID: 10808871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]