These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10535345)

  • 1. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome.
    Olagundoye V; MacKenzie IZ
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 17439569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction.
    Baerthlein WC; Moodley S; Stinson SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 3960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].
    Altmann P; Georgiades E; Reinold E; Wagenbichler P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):949-55. PubMed ID: 1213260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Maternal and fetal prognosis of occipito-posterior presentation].
    Riethmuller D; Teffaud O; Eyraud JL; Sautière JL; Schaal JP; Maillet R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Feb; 28(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10394515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Significance of trial vacuum extraction in the framework of obstetric surgery in vertex presentation].
    Krause W; Frenzel J; Raphael M; Michels W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Aug; 45(8):539-45. PubMed ID: 4043705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.