These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10536635)

  • 1. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study.
    Seo DG; Choi J; Kim J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2024; 21():18. PubMed ID: 38977033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computer-based test item-bank for cognitive assessment of medical students during a clinical medicine clerkship.
    Brooks CM; Dismukes WE; Williams GR; Brown S
    Med Educ; 1982 Jan; 16(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 7057718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations.
    Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():17. PubMed ID: 28811394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal number of strata for the stratified methods in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E48. PubMed ID: 25012203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities.
    Fischer MR; Kopp V; Holzer M; Ruderich F; Jünger J
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 16147800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive test to assess patient-reported physical functioning.
    McCabe E; Gross DP; Bulut O
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2393-2402. PubMed ID: 29881895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing.
    He Y; Chen P
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item-saving assessment of self-care performance in children with developmental disabilities: A prospective caregiver-report computerized adaptive test.
    Chen CT; Chen YL; Lin YC; Hsieh CL; Tzeng JY; Chen KL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193936. PubMed ID: 29561879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
    Chae YM; Park SG; Park I
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item response theory: applications of modern test theory in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Med Educ; 2003 Aug; 37(8):739-45. PubMed ID: 12945568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introduction of patient video clips into computer-based testing: effects on item statistics and reliability estimates.
    Lieberman SA; Frye AW; Litwins SD; Rasmusson KA; Boulet JR
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S48-51. PubMed ID: 14557094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.