158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10537464)
1. By the numbers. Examining the appropriateness of care.
Stanton M
Healthplan; 1999; 40(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 10537464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cancer diagnosis and treatment in Medicare fee-for-service and managed care plans.
Riley GF; Warren JL; Potosky AL; Klabunde CN; Harlan LC; Osswald MB
Med Care; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1108-15. PubMed ID: 18815533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical appropriateness: the only real measure of quality.
Jacobs CM
Cost Qual Q J; 1997 Dec; 3(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10176221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stop me before I kill again.
Friedman E
Healthc Forum J; 1998; 41(6):8, 10-2. PubMed ID: 10346621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Physician resource profiling enhances utilization management.
Krentz SE; Miller TR
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Oct; 52(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 10187614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antibiotic prescribing rates.
Potter PJ
CMAJ; 1999 Aug; 161(3):245-6. PubMed ID: 10463042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician profiling: using software to refine the art.
Gilbert JA
Health Data Manag; 1998 Jun; 6(6):86-8, 90, 92-3. PubMed ID: 10180315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pattern-of-treatment differences among primary care physicians in alternative systems of care.
Cave DG
Benefits Q; 1994; 10(3):6-19. PubMed ID: 10136672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managed health plan effects on the specialty referral process: results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network referral study.
Forrest CB; Nutting P; Werner JJ; Starfield B; von Schrader S; Rohde C
Med Care; 2003 Feb; 41(2):242-53. PubMed ID: 12555052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two views of managed care's quality.
Manag Care; 1995 Sep; 4(9):60. PubMed ID: 10151683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. By the numbers. Quality and satisfaction in Medicaid managed care.
Treanor K
Healthplan; 1999; 40(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10557741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring physician performance: enhancing quality of care, reducing costs.
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Sep; Suppl Decison Maker News():1-4. PubMed ID: 14567451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Drug use benchmarks show surprising geographic variation.
Capitation Rates Data; 2002 Mar; 7(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 11915510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Best practice from a health plan standpoint: the 'who, how, and when' of influenza immunization.
Tzeel A
Manag Care; 2007 Aug; 16(8 Suppl 8):10-2; discussion 17-9. PubMed ID: 17927018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Don't like your health-plan profile? Challenge it!
Bellile SK
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):80, 89-90, 93. PubMed ID: 10338833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Piecing together your profile. What plans know about you, and how they use it.
Gramling A
Manag Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):17-8, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 10141786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why treatment varies so greatly.
Weinberg J
Med Econ; 1997 Feb; 74(3):40-2, 45-6, 49-50 passim. PubMed ID: 10164576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bringing clinical accuracy to provider profiling systems.
Dubois R; Blank K
Manag Care Q; 1995; 3(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10142026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Don't rely on MCOs--take systems approach to physician practice data collection.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Nov; 1(5):77-80. PubMed ID: 10345342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Waiting on clinicians to catch up.
Sandrick K
Health Manag Technol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 10178853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
