126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10539013)
1. Kansas ruling threatens peer review. Adams v. St. Francis Medical Center.
DeWitt AL
Cost Qual Q J; 1999 Jun; 5(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 10539013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The confidentiality of peer review records: Adams vs St. Francis Hospital.
Reid DL
Kans Nurse; 1998 Apr; 73(4):6. PubMed ID: 10603829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse peer review records not totally privileged. Case on point: Adams v. St. Francis Regional Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169-KS (1998).
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Jul; 39(2):4. PubMed ID: 10067615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community.
Glabman M
Trustee; 2005 Apr; 58(4):6-10, 12, 1. PubMed ID: 15881498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers.
Brown LC
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
Dollar CJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal court finds immunity under HCQIA. Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Oct; 15(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 10186229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
Cassidy MA
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
Donovan RE
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicians denied access to credentialing file data. Amaral v. St. Cloud Hospital.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Dec; 18(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11188176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review immunity? Think again: recent developments in federal and state law.
Spevak C
Physician Exec; 2007; 33(3):76-8. PubMed ID: 17539569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):153-4. PubMed ID: 10621281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
van Geertruyden YH
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Courts examine use of peer review documents. Young v. Saldanha; Ashokan v. Nevada.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Jun; 11(8):5-8. PubMed ID: 10184108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting hospital records from discovery.
Ropiequet JL
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10129389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidentiary privilege for peer review documents rejected by the Fourth Circuit. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 May; 19(7):6-8. PubMed ID: 11989437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HCQIA immunity denied by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Jun; 14(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 10184707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting the confidentiality of peer review information.
McCann RW
J AHIMA; 1993 Dec; 64(12):52-6; quiz 57-8. PubMed ID: 10130489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Necessity of physician's signature on hospital medical records.
Stratton WT
Kans Med; 1994 Mar; 95(3):57. PubMed ID: 8007514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
