505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10539472)
1. HCFA to step up enforcement of nursing home initiatives in second year; facilities could face tougher scrutiny.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(14):1-3. PubMed ID: 10539472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nursing home care: ensuring quality.
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 1998; 24(6):64-5. PubMed ID: 10351722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lawmakers press for stepped up oversight of nursing facilities.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Aug; 6(16):2-4. PubMed ID: 10182230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Enforcement heats up as HCFA and Congress spar.
Fogg RJ
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Dec; 21(12):43. PubMed ID: 10346156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. National report calls for more teeth in implementing enforcement remedies.
Weiss HP
Balance; 1999; 3(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 10346527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA nulls enforcement of nursing home rules.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1989 Feb; 19(8):4, 6. PubMed ID: 10291931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey to stress quality assurance.
Wagner L
Provider; 1995 Jul; 21(7):37-8. PubMed ID: 10143788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding administrative appeals.
Bianculli JL
Provider; 1999 Feb; 25(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10345492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole new ballgame--providers prepare for enforcement.
Burgess KL
Provider; 1995 Feb; 21(2):41-2, 44, 46. PubMed ID: 10140828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mixed messages. Just as HHS debuts plan to boost accountability, CMS looks to ease inspections.
Lovern E
Mod Healthc; 2001 Nov; 31(48):6-7, 3. PubMed ID: 11765651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rewriting the book on quality.
Gold MF
Provider; 1999 Jul; 25(7):suppl 2-4. PubMed ID: 10539079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HCFA releases revised enforcement procedures, providers concerned about focus on punishment.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jan; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10787997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing, GAO report focus on multiple G deficiencies.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1999 Aug; 25(8):10. PubMed ID: 10747601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Providers disappointed in decision on deemed status; reaction to proposed new enforcement initiatives mixed.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jul; 6(15):1-2. PubMed ID: 10181971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Problems persist with enforcement rule. Surveys find most facilities out of compliance as moratorium ends.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1995 Nov; 21(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 10152227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bracing for enforcement.
Myder JA
Provider; 1994 Apr; 20(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 10133532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Update on nursing home care in Oklahoma.
Winn P; Longanacre C; Prather G
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2001 Aug; 94(8):350-4. PubMed ID: 11515384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Driving improvement in long-term care. Enforcement and quality initiatives.
Nedza S
J Leg Med; 2005 Mar; 26(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 15849098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Standards of care and sanctions for breaches: the survey process in long-term care.
Chester CF
J Long Term Care Adm; 1989; 17(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 10304017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HCFA cleans up survey procedures.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Feb; 17(2):22. PubMed ID: 10134013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
