233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10539619)
1. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.
Dubay L; Kaestner R; Waidmann T
J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey.
Küçük M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28891358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.
Baicker K; Buckles KS; Chandra A
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(5):w355-67. PubMed ID: 16895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.
Grant D; McInnes MM
Inquiry; 2004; 41(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 15449432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery.
Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fear of litigation and cesarean section rates.
Minkoff H
Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 23009974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do tort reforms impact the incidence of birth by cesarean section? A reassessment.
Cano-Urbina J; Montanera D
Int J Health Econ Manag; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 28477295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetric litigation: effects on clinical practice.
Symon A
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2000; 40(3-4):165-71. PubMed ID: 11326163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.
Yang YT; Mello MM; Subramanian SV; Studdert DM
Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19169125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defensive medicine and obstetrics.
Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Lloyd M; Fordyce M; Rosenblatt RA
JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1606-10. PubMed ID: 7474245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.
Localio AR; Lawthers AG; Bengtson JM; Hebert LE; Weaver SL; Brennan TA; Landis JR
JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 8418343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal birth after cesarean: issues and implications.
Resick LK; Erlen JA
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1990; 2(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 2400620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.
Ryan K; Schnatz P; Greene J; Curry S
Conn Med; 2005 Mar; 69(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 15861999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malpractice Claim Fears and the Costs of Treating Medicare Patients: A New Approach to Estimating the Costs of Defensive Medicine.
Reschovsky JD; Saiontz-Martinez CB
Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 53(3):1498-1516. PubMed ID: 28127752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of the mass media on obstetricians' behavior in Norway.
Grytten J; Skau I; Sørensen R
Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):986-993. PubMed ID: 28774730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.
Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.
Stafford RS
JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):683-7. PubMed ID: 2296123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defensive medicine during hospital obstetrical care: a byproduct of the technological age.
Bassett KL; Iyer N; Kazanjian A
Soc Sci Med; 2000 Aug; 51(4):523-37. PubMed ID: 10868668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malpractice, defensive medicine, and obstetric behavior.
Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
Med Care; 1997 Feb; 35(2):172-91. PubMed ID: 9017954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.
Zwecker P; Azoulay L; Abenhaim HA
Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 21249618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
