These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10539979)
1. Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications. Acklin MW Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 10539979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Garb HN Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 10539978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case of overstatement? Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 10539981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What the Rorschach can do for you: incremental validity in clinical applications. Weiner IB Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 10539980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rorschach intercoder reliability for protocol-level comprehensive system variables in an international sample. Sahly J; Shaffer TW; Erdberg P; O'Toole S J Pers Assess; 2011 Nov; 93(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 21999382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research. Weiner IB J Clin Psychol; 2000 Mar; 56(3):435-8; discussion 441-8. PubMed ID: 10726676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: a critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO; Garb HN; Nezworski MT J Clin Psychol; 2000 Mar; 56(3):395-430; discussion 431-4. PubMed ID: 10726675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Psychometric Validity of Individual Variables. Tibon Czopp S; Zeligman R J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 27153465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighing evidence for the Rorschach's validity: a response to Wood et al. (1999). Ganellen RJ J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11562095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current assessment practice, personality measurement, and rorschach usage by psychologists. Musewicz J; Marczyk G; Knauss L; York D J Pers Assess; 2009 Sep; 91(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 19672751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical support for interrater reliability of Rorschach Comprehensive System coding. Viglione DJ; Taylor N J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jan; 59(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 12508335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A replication of Rorschach and MMPI-2 convergent validity. Meyer GJ; Riethmiller RJ; Brooks RD; Benoit WA; Handler L J Pers Assess; 2000 Apr; 74(2):175-215. PubMed ID: 10879351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advancing scientific discourse in the controversy surrounding the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a rejoinder to Meyer (2000). Wood JM; Nezworski MT; Stejskal WJ; Garven S J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 11499452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: a meta-analytic review. Gronnerod C J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):272-93. PubMed ID: 12763701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Rorschach and psychopathy: toward a more accurate understanding of the research findings. Gacono CB; Loving JL; Bodholdt RH J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):16-38. PubMed ID: 11562100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rorschach Comprehensive System data for a sample of 150 adult nonpatients from Israel. Berant E J Pers Assess; 2007; 89 Suppl 1():S67-73. PubMed ID: 18039172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological issues in evaluating Rorschach validity: a comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996). Wood JM; Nezworski MT; Stejskal WJ; Garven S; West SG Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 10335017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]