These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10539983)

  • 1. Performance of the Personality Inventory for Youth validity scales.
    Wrobel TA; Lachar D; Wrobel NH; Morgan ST; Gruber CP
    Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):367-80. PubMed ID: 10539983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parent-child discrepancies in report of psychopathology: the contributions of response bias and parenting stress.
    Stokes J; Pogge D; Wecksell B; Zaccario M
    J Pers Assess; 2011; 93(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 21859293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles.
    Hopwood CJ; Talbert CA; Morey LC; Rogers R
    J Clin Psychol; 2008 Mar; 64(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 18302214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Assessment of malingering and dissimulation in the examination of subjects with mental and psychosomatic disorders].
    Dohrenbusch R; Henningsen R; Merten T
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2011 Jun; 63(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 21698944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Negative response bias and the validity of personality profiles in neuropsychiatric assessment].
    Merten T; Friedel E; Mehren G; Stevens A
    Nervenarzt; 2007 May; 78(5):511-2, 514-6, 518-20. PubMed ID: 17225145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the disorder matter? Investigating a moderating effect on coached noncredible overreporting using the MMPI-2 and PAI.
    Veltri CO; Williams JE
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 23118265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: the Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness Index.
    Peebles J; Moore RJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Aug; 54(5):621-8. PubMed ID: 9696112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of the Malingering Discriminant Function Index for the MMPI-2.
    Bacchiochi JR; Bagby RM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Aug; 87(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16856786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construction of validity scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
    Van Whitlock R; Lubin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 9530716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and genuine psychopathology.
    Berry DT; Bagby RM; Smerz J; Rinaldo JC; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):496-516. PubMed ID: 11499461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships among clinical and validity scales of the Basic Personality Inventory.
    Kroner DG; Reddon JR
    J Clin Psychol; 1994 Jul; 50(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 7983200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.
    Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD
    Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.
    Rogers R; Gillard ND; Wooley CN; Kelsey KR
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22855508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The latent structure of cognitive symptom exaggeration on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test.
    Frazier TW; Youngstrom EA; Naugle RI; Haggerty KA; Busch RM
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 17276652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW; Cruise KR; Wang EW; Ustad KL
    Assessment; 1998 Dec; 5(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 9835663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Convergent validity of the personality assessment inventory: A study of emergency referrals in a correctional setting.
    Rogers R; Ustad KL; Salekin RT
    Assessment; 1998 Mar; 5(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 9458336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faking and its detection on the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory.
    Holden RR
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1235-40. PubMed ID: 7480492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity?
    Holden RR; Wood LL; Tomashewski L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jul; 81(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 11474721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of simulating borderline personality disorder on the MMPI-2: a costs-benefits model employing base rates.
    Sivec HJ; Hilsenroth MJ; Lynn SJ
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Apr; 64(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 7722855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.